分七个部分

CHAPTER I Introduction to Evidence and Evidence Rules

Part One: Origins and Organizing Principles of Evidence Law

A. The Origins of a Rational System of Evidence Law

James B. Thayer, A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence (1898)

B. The Origins of Contemporary Evidence Scholarship

WILLIAM TWINING, THEORIES OF EVIDENCE BENTHAM AND WIGMORE (1985)

Kenneth W. Graham, Jr., 'There'll Always Be an England': The Instrumental Ideology of Evidence, 85 MICH. L. REV. 1204, 1207-09, 1228-31, 1234 (1987)

C. The "Organizing Principles" of Evidence Law

Edward J. Imwinkeiried, The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis as to the Logical Structure of Evidence Law, 46 U. MIAMI L. REV. 1069, 1069-71 (1992)

Dale Nance, The Best Evidence Principle, 73 IOWA L. REV. 227 (1988)

Edward J. Imwinkelried, The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis as to the Logical Structure of Evidence Law, 46 U. MIAMI L. REV. 1069, 1074-77 (1992)

D. Evidence and Gender

Kit Kinports, Evidence Engendered, 1991 U. ILL. L. REV. 413 (1991)

Part Two: Statutory Interpretation

Edward Cleary, Preliminary Notes on Reading the Rules of Evidence, 57 NEB. L. REV. 908 (1978)

Edward R. Becker & Aviva Orenstein, The Federal Rules of Evidence After Sixteen Years--The Effect of "Plain Meaning" Jurisprudence, The Need for an Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence, and Suggestions for Selective Revision of the Rules, 60 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 857 (1992)

Andrew E. Taslitz, Interpretive Method and the Federal Rules of Evidence: A Call for a Politically Realistic Hermeneutics, 32 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 329 (1995)

Randolph N. Jonakait, The Supreme Court. Plain Meaning, and the Changed Rules of Evidence, 68 TEX. L. REV. 745 (1990)

Glen Weissenberger, The Supreme Court and the Interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 53 OHIO. ST. L.J. 1307 (1992)

Edward J. Imwinkelried, A Brief Defense of the Supreme Court's Approach to the Interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 27 IND. L. REV. 267 (1993)

Eileen A. Scallen, Classical Rhetoric, Practical Reasoning, and the Law of Evidence, 44 AM. U. L. REV. 101 (1995)

CHAPTER II Logical Relevance

A. Conditional Logical Relevance

John MacArthur Maguire & Charles S. S. Epstein, Preliminary Questions of Fact in Determining the Admissibility of Evidence, 40 HARV. L. REV. 392 (1927)

Edmund M. Morgan, Functions of Judge and Jury in the Determination of Preliminary Questions Fact, 43 HARV. L. REV. 165 (1929)

John Kaplan, Of Mabrus and ZorgssAn Essay in Honor of David Louisell, 66 CAL. L. REV. 987 (1978)

Dale A. Nance, Conditional Relevance Reinterpreted, 70 B.U. L. REV. 447 (1990)

B. The Validation of Scientific Evidence

Paul C. Giannelli, The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later, 80 COLUM. L. REV. 1197 (1980)

Stephen A. Saltzburg, Frye end Alternatives, 99 F.R.D. 208 (1983)

James E. Starrs, Frye v. United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 115 F.R.D. 92 (1987)

Bert Black, Francisco J. Ayala & Carol Saffran-Brinks, Science and the Law in the Wake of Daubert: A New Search for Scientific Knowledge, 72 TEX. L. REV. 715 (1994)

Kenneth J. Chesebro, Taking Daubert's Focus Seriously: The Methodology/Conclusion Distinction, 15 CARDOZO L. REV. 1745 (1994)

C. The Validity of Non-Scientitic Expert Testimony

John William Strong, Language and Logic in Expert Testimony: Limiting Expert Testimony by Restrictions of Function, Reliability, and Form, 71 OR. L. REV. 349 (1992)

David McCord, Syndromes, Profiles and Other Mental Exotica: A New Approach to the Admissibility of Nontraditional Psychological Evidence in Criminal Cases, 66 OR. L. REV. 19 (1987)

David L. Faigman, To Have and Have Not: Assessing the Value of Social Science to the Law as Science and Policy, 38 EMORY L.J. 1005 (1989)

Randolph N. Jonakait, Real Science and Forensic Science, 1 SHEPARO'S EXP. AND SCI. EVID. Q. 435 (1994)

CHAPTER III "Legal Relevance"

A. The Concept of "Legal Relevance"

M. C. Slough, Relevancy Unraveled, 5 KANSAS L. REV. 1 (1956)

Herman L. Trautman, Logical or Legal RelevancysA Conflict in Theory, 5 VAND. L. REV. 385 (1952)

Victor J. Gold, Limiting Judicial Discretion to Exclude Prejudicial Evidence, 18 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 59 (1984)

Richard O. Lempert, Modeling Relevance, 75 MICH. L. REV. 1021 (1977)

B. The Role of Judicial Discretion in the Legal Relevance Doctrine

Jon R. Waltz, Judicial Discretion in the Admission of Evidence Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, 79 NW. U. L. REV. 1097 (1985)

Thomas W. Mengler, The Theory of Discretion in the Federal Rules of Evidence, 74 IOWA L. REV. 413, 416-25, 446-47, 457-58 (1989)

CHAPTER IV Privileges and Extrinsic Social Policy

A. The History and Theory of Privilege Law

Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., An Historical Perspective on the Attorney-Client Privilege, 66 CAL. L. REV. 1061 (1978)

David W. Louiseil, Confidentiality, Conformity and Confusion: Privileges in Federal Court Today, 31 TULANE L. REV. 101 (1956)

B. Privileges Under the Federal Rules of Evidence

Thomas G. Krattenmaker, Testimonial Privileges in Federal Courts: An Alternative to the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence, 62 GEO. L.J. 61 (1973)

Thomas G. Krattenmaker, Interpersonal Testimonial Privileges Under the Federal Rules of Evidence: A Suggested approach, 64 GEO. L.J. 613 (1976)

C. An Alternate Theory of Privileges

Sanford Levinson, Testimonial Privileges and the Preferences of Friendship, 1984 DUKE L.J. 631

D. Exceptions to Privileges

Harry I. Subin, The Lawyer as Superego: Disclosure of Client Confidences to Prevent Harm, 70 IOWA L. REV. 1091 (1985)

Robert P. Mosteller, Child Abuse Reporting Laws and Attorney-Client Confidences: The Reality and the Specter of Lawyer as Informant, 42 DUKE L.J. 203 (1992)

John G. Fleming and Bruce Maximov, The Patient or His Victim: The Therapist's Dilemma, 62 CAL. L. REV. 1025 (1974)

E. Spousal Immunity

Richard O. Lempert, A Right to Every Woman's Evidence, 66 IOWA L. REV. 725 (1981)

F. Other Extrinsic Social Policy and the Law of Evidence

M.C. Slough, Relevancy Unraveled, Part 111, 5 KAN. L. REV. 675 (1957)

CHAPTER V Character Evidence

Part One: General Considerations

A. The Logic

H. Richard Uviller, Evidence of Character to Prove Conduct: Illusion, Illogic, and Injustice in the Courtroom, 130 U. PA. L. REV. 845 (1982)

Richard B. Kuhns, The Propensity to Misunderstand the Character of Specific Acts Evidence, 66 IOWA L. REV. 777 (1981)

Glen Weissenberger, Making Sense of Extrinsic Act Evidence: Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), 70 IOWA L. REV. 579 (1985)

B. The Psychological Assumptions

David P. Leonard, The Use of Character to Prove Conduct: Rationality and Catharsis in the Law of Evidence, 58 U. COLO. L. REV. 1 (1986-87)

Part Two: Specific Problems

A. Evidence of Detendant's Character In Sex-Related Crimes

David P. Bryden and Roger C. Park, Other Crimes. Evidence in Sex Offense Cases, 78 MINN. L. REV. 529 (1994)

B. The Sexual History of Rape Victims

Harriett R. Galvin, Shielding Rape Victims in the State and Federal Courts: A Proposal for the Second Decade, 70 MINN. L. REV. 763 (1986)

C. Character and Credibillty

Richard Friedman, Character Impeachment: Psycho-Bayesian [!?] Analysis and a Proposed Overhaul, 38 UCLA L. REV.637 (1991)

CHAPTER VI HEARSAY

Part One: The Definition of Hearsay

John MacArthur Maguire, The Hearsay System: Around and Through the Thicket, 14 VAND. L. REV. 741 (1961)

Edmund M. Morgan, Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept, 62 HARV. L. REV.177 (1948)

Judson F. Falknor, The Hearsay Rule as a "See-Do" Rule: Evidence of Conduct, 33 ROCKY MTN. L. REV.133 (1961)

Olin Guy Wellborn lil, The Definition of Hearsay in the Federal Rules of Evidence, 61 TEX L REV 49 (1982)

I. Daniel Stewart, Jr., Perception, Memory, and Hearsay: A Criticism of the Present Law and the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence, 1970 UTAH L. REV.1

Roger C. Park, "I Didn't Tell Them Anything About You": Implied Assertions Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, 74 MINN. L. REV. 783 (1990)

Michael H. Graham, "Stickperson Hearsay": A Simplified Approach to Understanding the Rule Against Hearsay, 1982 U. ILL. L. REV.903

Laurence H. Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay, 87 HARV. L. REV. 957 (1974)

Eleanor Swift, A Foundation Fact Approach to Hearsay, 75 CAL. L. REV.1339 (1987)

Part Two: Admissible Hearsay

A. Overview of Admissible Hearsay

B. Admissions

Christopher B. Mueller, The Federal Coconspirator Exception: Action, Assertion, and Hearsay, 12 HOFSTRA L. REV. 323 (1984)

C. Spontaneous Statements

Jon R. Waltz, The Present Sense Impression Exception to the Rule Against Hearsay: Origins and Attributes, 66 IOWA L. REV.869 (1981)

D. The Hillmon Doctrine

Brooks W. MacCracken, The Case of the Anonymous Corpse, AMERICAN HERITAGE. June 1968, at 51

John M. Maguire, The Hillmon CasesThirty-Three Years After, 38 HARV. L. REV.709 (1925)

E. Records and Reports

Charles T. McCormick, Can Courts Make Wider Use of Reports of Official Investigations?, 42 IOWA L. REV.363, 364-65 (1957)

Paul C. Giannelli, The Admissibility of Laboratory Reports in Criminal Trials: The Reliability of Scientific Proof, 49 OHIO ST. L.J. 671 (1988)

F. Child Sexual Abuse and Confrontation

Robert P. Mosteller, Child Sexual Abuse and Statements for the Purpose of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment, 67 N.C. L. REV. 257 (1989)

G. Reform of the Hearsay System

Roger Park, A Subject Matter Approach to Hearsay Reform, 86 MICH. L. REV. 51 (1987)

CHAPTER VII The Cumulative Legal Sutticlency of the Evidence

A. Presumptions

Ronald J. Allen, Presumptions in Civil Actions Reconsidered, 66 IOWA L. REV. 843 (1981)

Francis H. Bohlen, The Effect of Rebuttable Presumptions of Law Upon the Burden of Proof, 68 U. PA. L. REV. 307 (1920)

Charles V. Laughlin, In Support of The Thayer Theory of Presumptions, 52 MICH. L. REV. 195 (1953)

Charles T. McCormick, What Shall the Trial Judge Tell the Jury About Presumptions?, 13 WASH. L REV. 185 (1938)

B. The Validity of Adapting Statistical Techniques to Use at Trial

Michael O. Finkelstein & William B. Fairley, A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence, 83 HARV. L REV.489 (1970)

David Kaye, The Laws of Probability and the Law of the Land, 47 U. CHI. L REV 34 (1979)

L. Jonathan Cohen, Subjective Probability and the Paradox of the Gatecrasher, 1981 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 627

David Kaye, Paradoxes, Gedanken Experiments and the Burden of Proof: A Response to Dr. Cohen's Reply, 1981 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 635

C. The Wisdom of Relying on Statistical Evidence to Satisfy the Burder of Proof

Laurence H. Tribe, Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process, 84 HARV. L REV.1329 (1971)

Charles Nesson, The Evidence or the Event? On Judicial Proof and the Acceptability of Verdicts, 98 HARV. L. REV 1357 (1985)

Daniel Shaviro, Statistical-Probability Evidence and the Appearance of Justice, 103 HARV. L REV 530 (1989)

（吴丹红提供）